foobar

In 0. 21 seconds, the first result is "Google Hash: md5(foobar) = 3858f62230ac3c915f300c664312c63f" .

秒内，第一个结果是“GoogleHash：md5（foobar）=3858f62230ac3c915f300c664312c63f”。

互联网摘选

Therefore foobar 2000 is serious competitor to its commercial analogs.

因此,foobar2000是严重的竞争对手,其商业类似物.

互联网摘选

To remove the ambiguity, you must explicitly tell the compiler which FooBar you want to create.

为了去掉不明确的引用，你必须明确地告诉编译器你到底要创建哪个。

互联网摘选

Create a second database called foobar

创建第二个名为foobar的数据库

互联网摘选

In other words, if you've supplied a value of "foobar" to the bearclaw attribute, it will get caught.

换句话说，如果您为bearclaw属性提供了一个值“foobar”，它就会被找出来。

互联网摘选

For example, the control treatment's headline copy might be "Foobar is a great service! Sign up here. "

例如，控制条件的标题文本可能是：“Foobar是个很好的服务！在这里注册。”

互联网摘选

Say we have a service called "Foobar" and we're conducting an experiment on our landing page.

假设我们有一项服务叫“Foobar”并且我们想在着陆页进行一次测试。

互联网摘选

In other words, if you've supplied a value of "foobar" to the bearclaw attribute, it will get caught.

换句话说，如果您为bearclaw属性提供了一个值“foobar”，它就会被找出来。

互联网摘选

Then as the value for a computed field you might code the following JavaScript (which displays foobar)

然后可以编写以下JavaScript（将显示foobar）作为computed字段的值

互联网摘选

If the second group matched the string foo, for example, then passing the replacement string$ 2bar would cause foobar to be appended to the string buffer.

例如，如果第二个组与字符串foo相匹配，则传递替换字符串$2bar将导致foobar被附加到字符串缓冲区。

互联网摘选

What point in the plane x X-axis is foobar y-axis ought to be foobass something else, right?

在平面中指向哪个点呢？，轴是foobar的？，does，p，now，point，to？，而y轴应该是其他一些foobass的，对不对？我知道这看起来像一个？

互联网摘选

All said but i think some people will stick with foobar.

我想或者可能有些人坚持用foobar。

互联网摘选

For example, take the MD5 hash of "foobar" : 3858f62230ac3c915f300c664312c63f.

举例来说，利用“foobar”的MD5散列：3858f62230ac3c915f300c664312c63f。

互联网摘选

Create a second database called foobar

创建第二个名为foobar的数据库

互联网摘选

I know, for a lot of you, it's like, OK, I got a heavy problem. Let's see, def Foobar open paren, a bunch of parameters.

我知道这对你们中的大多数人来说，应该没问题了，好，这儿我碰到了，一个严重的问题，我们看看，一堆参数。

互联网摘选

In my opinion, at first 1. 6 a lot like foobar (1. 5) but lately i think yours is better for audiophile users.

在我的意见，首先1.6非常似foobar（1.5）但最后我认为你的（JEP）对音响用家较好。

互联网摘选